Cherry v. Steiner’s Empirical Analysis
716 F.2d 687 · 1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2021
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Parratt v. Taylor · Paul v. Davis · Kastigar v. United States · Hicks v. Miranda · Chicago Co v. City of Chicago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The enrolled bill doctrine . . . forestall[s] judicial inquiry into procedural irregularities occurring prior to the enactment of bills, not inherent defects in bills as enrolled.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[A] state cannot validly effect a taking of property by the simple expedient of holding that the property right never existed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.