United States v. Cates’s Empirical Analysis
716 F.3d 445 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Raymond v. Ameritech Corp. · Varhol v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. · United States v. Anderson · Harrington v. City of Chicago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• the danger of unfair prejudice to the government, • the length of the delay and its potential impact on the judicial proceedings, • the reasons for the delay, and • whether the movant acted in good faith.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any aspect of [the] conviction or sentence on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.