Williams v. Ozmint’s Empirical Analysis
716 F.3d 801 · 2013
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 753 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Pearson v. Callahan · Erickson v. Pardus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] case is moot when the issues presented are no longer 'live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the right violated was clearly established at the time of the official's conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“should be addressed first in light of the circumstances in the particular case at hand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.