May v. Chrysler Group, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
716 F.3d 963 · 2012
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A
Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Carole Kolstad v. American Dental Association · McKenzie v. Illinois Department of Transportation · Wyninger v. New Venture Gear, Inc. · Thomas v. Cook County Sheriff's Department
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a highly charitable assessment of the evidence.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An employer's response to alleged instances of employee harassment must be reasonably calculated to prevent further harassment under the particular facts and circumstances of the case at the time the allegations are made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because a jury has rendered a verdict, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to that verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.