United States v. Shrader’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2261A · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Nixon · Upjohn Company v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]or [this victim] and other alleged stalking victims to have to choose whether to obtain counseling knowing that their alleged stalkers can subpoena the records thereof would be no choice at all. This chilling effect is precisely what the Supreme Court foresaw and explicitly rejected in Jaffee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must be able to predict with some degree of certainty whether particular discussions will be protected. An uncertain privilege, or one which purports to be certain but results in widely varying applications by the courts, is little better than no privilege at all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]xceptions to the privilege, even in the [s]ixth [a]mendment context, would ... eviscerate the effectiveness of the privilege”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Fay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.