Bluck v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Serino v. State (2003), Kien v. State (2003)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fugate v. State · Mitchem v. State · Bacher v. State · Morgan v. State · Edgecomb v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This authority is found in the text of the Constitution and is independent from our general appellate jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. McMahon v. State · Perry v. State“inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) The reviewing court will not revise a sentence authorized by statute except where such sentence is manifestly unreasonable in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender. (2) A sentence is not manifestly unres-sonable unless no reasonable person could find such sentence appropriate to the particular offense and offender for which such sentence was imposed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State · Walker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.