Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 NE2D 79 - Larry v. State

Larry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hardin v. State · Bacher v. State · Minnick v. State · Thompson v. State · Cox v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ind. Evidence Rule 404(b) provides: Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts, Eivi-dence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, provided that upon request by the accused, the prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, or during trial if the court excuses pre-trial notice on good cause shown, of the general nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Id. at 81 . Thus, the evidence of guilty knowledge was properly admissible under the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “guilty knowledge or consciousness of guilt with respect to the charged crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.