Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 P2D 381 - McClain v. McClain

McClain v. McClain’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Borchgrevink v. Borchgrevink (1997), Lone Wolf v. Lone Wolf (1987)

27 state decisions

13019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gratrix v. Gratrix · In Re Marriage of Burham · Nichols v. Nichols · 92 Cal. App. 3d 834 - In Re Marriage of Neal · Headlough v. Headlough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the record shows an abuse of discretion or if controlling factual findings are clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is a pertinent factor because it demonstrates that cooperation between the parents is possible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(c) The court shall determine custody in accordance with the best interests of the child under AS 25.20.060-25.20.130. In determining the best interests of the child the court shall consider (1) the physical, emotional, mental, religious, and social needs of the child; (2) the capability and desire of each parent to meet these needs; (3) the child’s preference if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form a preference; (4) the love and affection existing between the child and each parent; (5) the length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity; (6) the desire and ability of each parent to allow an open and loving frequent relationship between the child and the other parent; (7) any evidence of domestic violence, child abuse, or child neglect in the proposed custodial household or a history of violence between the parents; (8) evidence that substance abuse by either parent or other members of the household directly affects the emotional or physical well-being of the child; (9) other factors that the court considers pertinent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.