Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 P.2d 790 - Secor v. Knight

Secor v. Knight’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

3 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2014

3 district · 17 state decisions

901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Easton v. Strassburger · 13 Utah 2d 83 - Bunnell v. Bills · Dugan v. Jones · 56 Cal. App. 3d 860 - Cooper v. Jevne · Stubbs v. Hemmert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the acts to be performed by the seller in a contract relate only to the delivery of title to the buyer.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Schafir v. Harrigan · Maynard v. Wharton
  2. “'that on delivery and acceptance of a deed the provisions of the underlying contract for the conveyance are deemed extinguished or superseded by the deed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Liquidating Trust of the Lovesac Corp. v. Cox (In Re the Lovesac Corp.) · Spears v. Warr
  3. “"(1) a representation; (2) concerning a presently existing material fact; (8) which was false; (4) which the representer either (a) knew to be false, or (b) made recklessly, knowing that he had insufficient knowledge on which to base such representation; (5) for the purpose of inducing the other party to act upon it; (6) that the other party, acting reasonably and in ignorance of its falsity; (7) did in fact rely upon it; (8) and was thereby induced to act; (9) to his injury and damage."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Maynard v. Wharton · Robinson v. Tripco Investment, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.