Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 So. 2d 1104 - Hooker v. State

716 So. 2d 1104 - Hooker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 860 So. 2d 704 - Howell v. State (2003), 909 So. 2d 731 - Dilworth v. State (2005)

29 state decisions

170199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Wong Sun v. United States · Davis v. Mississippi · Castor v. United States · Hughey v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny person who is present at the commission of a criminal offense and aids, counsels, or encourages another in the commission of that offense is an 'aider and abettor' and is equally guilty with the principal offender.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Ordinarily, trial judges have broad discretion in determining how long trials last on any given day.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Any person who is present at the commission of a criminal offense and aids, counsels, or encourages another in the commission of that offense is an `aider and abettor' and is equally guilty with the principal offender".... "Aiding and abetting is defined to be `the offense committed by those persons who, although not the direct perpetrators of a crime, are yet present at its commission, doing some act to render aid to the actual perpetrator'.... And such aiding and abetting may be manifested by acts, words, signs, motions, or any conduct which unmistakably evinces a design to encourage, incite or approve of the crime, or even by being present, with the intention of giving assistance, if necessary, though such assistance may not be called into requisition."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.