716 So. 2d 224 - Singleton v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Parker v. Parker (2006), J.B. v. A.B. (2004)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nunn v. Baker · Wallace v. TEE JAYS MFG. CO., INC. · Ex Parte Smith · 686 So. 2d 298 - Dismukes v. Dorsey · 676 So. 2d 354 - STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Zegarelli
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before addressing the merits of the issues raised on appeal, we must first consider whether this court has jurisdiction over the mother's appeal. ' "[J]urisdictional matters are of such magnitude that we take notice of them at any time and do so even ex mero motu .”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Parker v. Parker · Newman v. Newman“'Since the appeal was not timely taken, the circuit court had no jurisdiction over the appeal; that is, it had no jurisdiction over the subject matter. Because of such lack of jurisdiction, the final judgment . . . as entered by the circuit court was void and will not support the appeal to this court. That lack of jurisdiction follows from the circuit court even to the appeal taken to this court for "whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`follows from the circuit court even to the appeal taken to this court for "[w]henever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.