Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

716 So. 2d 295

Johnston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-07-24

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2004

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-07-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences, but remand for correction of the judgment entered by the trial court. The appellant was properly sentenced as a capital offender, and his offenses should be specifically classified as capital offenses. We therefore remand for the correction of the judgment that incorrectly classified the offenses as “FL,” apparently meaning “Felony Life.”

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
/716/so2d/295 · .json · Public domain