Bennett v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 688 So. 2d 137 - State, Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. Matthews · 638 So. 2d 275 - Collins v. Estrade · 646 So. 2d 1149 - Zahn v. Hibernia Nat. Bank · 550 So. 2d 754 - Emfinger v. Emfinger · Constant v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A judgment of default must be confirmed by proof of the demand sufficient to establish a prima facie case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beevers v. Burmaster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.