Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 SO2D 584 - Randall v. State

Randall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably State v. Nordstrom (2001), 877 So. 2d 1254 - Lynch v. State (2004)

44 state decisions

320199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Purkett v. Elem · Castaneda v. Partida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the totality of the relevant facts gives rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an explanation that is persuasive, or even plausible.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “`[A]ny reason which is not facially violative of equal protection will suffice.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.