¶1We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. Viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to sustaining the order, we find that the state never established that appellant was in such proximity to the area where the evidence was discovered to justify the search and seizure as incident to lawful arrest.
716 So. 2d 806
Slagle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 15, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-07-15
Decided 1998-07-15