Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 S.W.2d 162 - Rose v. State

Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2011

9 state decisions

501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 203rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville · United States v. Petrillo · United States v. Powell · Plante v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statutes of limitations, being measures of public policy subject to the will of the legislature, may be changed or repealed without violating constitutional provisions against ex post facto laws in any case where a right to acquittal has not been absolutely acquired by the completion of the period of limitations. However, a prosecution barred by a statute of limitations cannot be revived by the passage of a statute extending the period of limitations since this would give the act an ex post facto operation. 21 TEX. JUR.3d, Criminal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.