Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 SW2D 27 - Simpson v. Simpson

Simpson v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2000
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. State · Forbes v. State · Davis v. Davis · Mikkelsen v. Mikkelsen · Chastain v. Chastain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a state of permanent insanity is once shown, the burden of proof shifts, and a lucid interval must be proved by the other side.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[S]anity is presumed, and if the contrary is alleged, it must be proved by the party imputing it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.