Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 SW2D 436 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2008

4 state decisions

20198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Guinan · State v. Cobb · Brown v. United States · State v. Cannady · State v. Quinn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An inference of guilt is permissible from the unexplained possession of property recently stolen in a burglary, and the inference exists as to both the burglary and the stealing. State v. Arnold, 566 S.W.2d 185, 188 [4] (Mo. banc 1978); State v. Cobb, 444 S.W.2d 408, 414 [9] (Mo. banc 1969). Such evidence is sufficient to support a submission of both the burglary and the stealing. State v. Miller, 499 S.W.2d 496, 499 [4] (Mo.1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.