In Re Doe’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Court proceedings — Confidential health care information. — (a) Except as provided in § 5-37.3-6, a health care provider or custodian of health care information may disclose confidential health care information in a judicial proceeding if the disclosure is pursuant to a subpoena and the provider or custodian is provided written certification by the party issuing the subpoena that: (1) A copy of the subpoena has been served by the party.on the individual whose records are being sought on or before the date the subpoena was served, together with a notice of the individual's right to challenge the subpoena; or, if the individual cannot be located within this jurisdiction, that an affidavit of that fact is provided; and (2) Twenty (20) days have passed from the date of service on the individual and within that lime period the individual has not initiated a challenge; or (3)Disclosure is ordered by a court after challenge. "(b) Within twenty (20) days after the date of service of a subpoena, an individual or his or her authorized representative may file a motion to quash the subpoena in the court in which the case is pending or, if no case is pending, in the superior court. A copy of the motion to quash shall be served by the movant upon the party issuing the subpoena in accordance with the rules of civil procedure. "(c) The party issuing the subpoena may file with the court these papers, including affidavits and other sworn documents, as sustain the validity of the subpoena. The”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena

2. ““(a) Except as provided in § 5-37.3-6, a health care provider or custodian of health care information may disclose confidential health care information in a judicial proceeding if the disclosure is pursuant to a subpoena and the provider or custodian is provided written certification by the party issuing the subpoena that: “(1) A copy of the subpoena has been served by the party on the individual whose records are being sought on or before the date the subpoena was served, together with a notice of the individual’s right to challenge the subpoena; or, if the individual cannot be located within this jurisdiction, that an affidavit of that fact is provided; and “(2) Twenty (20) days have passed from the date of service on the individual and within that time period the individual has not initiated a challenge; or “(3) Disclosure is ordered by a court after challenge. * * *.” (Emphasis added.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Pastore v. Samson

3. “adequately addresses the heretofore recognized constitutional infirmities and strikes a permissible balance between a party's interest in maintaining the confidentiality of his or her personal health care records and the court's need to access relevant information.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Danielle LeFebvre