Bahramizadeh v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
717 F.2d 1170 · 1983
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2015
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Plyler v. Doe · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stanisic · LAC Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Voigt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An agency may not interpret its regulations in a manner so as to nullify the effective intent or wording of a regulation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ubstantial performance of all conditions imposed by ... a bond shall release the obligor from liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ruiz-Rivera v. Moyer““A bond is breached when there has been a substantial violation of the stipulated conditions.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.