United States v. Key’s Empirical Analysis
717 F.2d 1206 · 1983
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably United States v. Darden (1995), United States v. Helmel (1985)
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Will v. United States · Hill v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 25 · Federal Election Commission v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The weighing of probative value against prejudicial effect is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and absent an abuse of discretion evidentiary rulings will not be disturbed on appeal. United States v. Foley, 683 F.2d 273 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043, 103 S.Ct. 463, 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'The decision of whether or not to remove a juror is normally vested in the wise discretion of the trial court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.