Streissel v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
717 F.2d 1231 · 1983
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
September 1997
most recently cited
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on McMillian v. Schweiker · Tennant v. Schweiker · Northcutt v. Califano · Simonson v. Schweiker · Tucker v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is simply insufficient for the ALJ to suggest in conclusory fashion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It was conceded at an early stage of the proceedings that Streissel could not return to the job that he had held for many years as a skilled machinist. The burden of proving that he could do light or sedentary work in a competitive work setting thus fell on the Secretary. Neither the administrative law judge (ALJ) nor the Secretary recognized that the Secretary had this burden. The government in its brief before this Court still fails to recognize this fact. We cannot assume that the ALJ or the Secretary would have reached the decision that they did had they properly apportioned the burden of proof. See Jackson v. Schweiker, 696 F.2d 630 , 631 n. 1 (8th Cir.1983); Tucker v. Schweiker, 689 F.2d 777, 779 (8th Cir.1982); Tennant v. Schweiker, 682 F.2d 707, 710 (8th Cir. 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. Callahan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.