Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 F.2d 1320 - Donovan v. Wp Pointon

Donovan v. Wp Pointon’s Empirical Analysis

717 F.2d 1320 · 1983

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Peters v. City of Shreveport (1987), Ferguson v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Cleveland, Inc. (1986)

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 255

Relies on National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho · Brennan v. Heard · Marshall v. Brunner · Mistretta v. Sandia Corp. · National Labor Relations Board v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he purpose of the present action is to bring [the employer] into compliance with the Act by enforcing a public right. To permit him in such a proceeding to try his private claims, real or imagined, against his employees would delay and even subvert the whole process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “removing and thinning trees, clearing brush, grading and contouring the land for streets and drainage, installing culverts, pouring concrete for curbs and laying asphalt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “goods or materials which have moved in interstate commerce constitutes a”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.