Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 F.2d 284 - Patterson v. Mintzes

Patterson v. Mintzes’s Empirical Analysis

717 F.2d 284 · 1983

Citation profile

122
cited by 122 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

72 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 122 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2018 · most notably Thomas v. Arn (1986), Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (1996)

72 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

5301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Bounds v. Smith · Pell v. Procunier · United States v. Raddatz · Cruz v. Beto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] total or near-total deprivation of exercise or recreational opportunity, without penological justification, violates Eighth Amendment guarantees.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ultimate responsibility of properly adjudicating the Article III controversy before it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that when written objections to a magistrate’s report are tendered beyond the 10 day period of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1), but are nevertheless filed and considered by the district court, the criteria identified in Walters in justification of the waiver rule promulgated therein dissipate and the rule will not apply to bar appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.