32 Fair Emplpraccas 1696 32 Empl Prac Dec P 33794’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2015
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · Curtis v. Loether · Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker · United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]onsistency with the policies reiterated in Crown, Cork & Seal requires that the tolling of the statute of limitations continue until a final adverse determination of class claims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pedro Yang Carol Jackson Peter S. Kelsch, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated Jason Thompson Raymond T. Crump v. Steven A. Odom Mark Gergel Hensley E. West Martin D. Kidder Stephen J. Clearman (d.c. Civil No. 02-Cv-05968) James Barberian Joseph Kinosian Karen Kinosian v. Steven A. Odom Mark Gergel Hensley E. West Martin D. Kidder Stephen J. Clearman (d.c. Civil No. 03-Cv-00725) Jason Thompson and Raymond T. Crump · Yang“would have every incentive to file a separate action prior to the expiration of his own period of limitations. The result would be a needless multiplicity of actions--precisely the situation that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the tolling rule of American Pipe were designed to avoid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.