Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Education v. Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education’s Empirical Analysis
717 F.2d 943 · 1983
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1234A · 20 U.S.C. § 1234B · 20 U.S.C. § 1234D · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 241A · 20 U.S.C. § 241E · 42 U.S.C. § 6000 (Developmental Disabilities Act of 1984) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Harris v. McRae · Rosado v. Wyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each application for a grant . . . shall contain an assurance that the use of the grant funds will not result in a decrease in the use for educationally deprived children residing in that project area of State or local funds, which, in the absence of funds under Title I of the Act, would be made available for that project area and that neither the project area nor the educationally deprived children residing therein will otherwise be penalized in the application of State and local funds because of such a use of funds under Title I of the Act. . . . Federal funds made available . . . (1) will be used to supplement, and to the extent practical increase, the level of State and local funds that would, in the absence of such Federal funds, be made available for the education of pupils participating in that project; (2) will not be used to supplant State and local funds available for the education of such pupils.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(i) as to supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the level of funds that would, in the absence of such federal funds, be made available from non-Federal sources for the education of pupils participating in programs and projects assisted under this subchapter, and (ii) in no case, as to supplant such funds from non-Federal sources.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“provide financial assistance ... to local educational agencies serving areas with concentrations of children from low-income families to expand and improve their educational programs by various means ... which contribute particularly to meeting the special educational needs of educationally deprived children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.