West v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis
717 F.3d 1030 · 2013
Citation profile
10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Blum v. Stenson · Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. Agyei · City of Burlington v. Dague · Copeland v. Marshall · Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] reasonable fee is one that is adequate to attract competent counsel, but that does not produce windfalls to attorneys.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.