Schlaud v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis
717 F.3d 451 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Hansberry v. Lee · Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All individuals who: (1) are home childcare providers in the State of Michigan, including all those classified as Group Homes, Family Homes, Relative Care Providers, or Day Care Aides, (2) had any Union dues or fees deducted from the subsidy paid to them by Michigan Department of Human Service, and (3) did not sign authorization cards for the Union or vote in elections that regarded Union representation or ratification of the Union’s collective bargaining agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schlaud v. Snyder“All individuals who: (1) are home childcare providers in the State of Michigan, including all those classified as Group ■Homes, Family Homes, Relative Care Providers, or Day Care Aides, and, (2) have had any Union dues or fees, deducted from the subsidy paid to them by Michigan’s Department of Human Service.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schlaud v. Snyder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.