Coach, Inc. v. Goodfellow’s Empirical Analysis
717 F.3d 498 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (§ 35 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. · Foster v. Barilow · Daddy's Junky Music Stores, Inc. v. Big Daddy's Family Music Center · Arban v. West Publishing Corp. · Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provide[d] . . . rental booths and storage units for vendors”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A party proves trademark infringement by showing (1) that it owns a trademark, (2) that the infringer used the mark in commerce without authorization, and (3) that the use of the alleged infringing trademark 'is likely to cause confusion among consumers regarding the origin of the goods offered by the parties.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“continued to facilitate those activities ... without undertaking a reasonable investigation or taking other appropriate remedial measures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.