Marriott Bros. v. Gage’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 215
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Carnegie v. United States · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Jacoway v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“specifically instructed by the RICO case statement order to include all facts upon which they would rely to initiate their complaint.... [They] cannot now be heard to argue that they would have presented other facts with regard to the defendants who did not move for summary judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.