Haynes v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2016
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1981 · 15 U.S.C. § 2310
Relies on Cannon v. University of Chicago · Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Whitworth Bros. Storage Co. · McI Communications Corporation McI v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company · Dreier v. Upjohn Co. · Slaymaker v. Westgate State Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to act wilfully and with the specific intent to deceive any purchaser or potential purchaser of a motor vehicle who inspects the odometer of a motor vehicle as an index of the condition and value of such vehicle.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.