Radosti v. Envision Emi, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
20 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1712 (§ 3 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Walsh v. Ford Motor Co. · In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although Congress did not define the term 'coupon' in the statute, courts have generally considered a coupon settlement to be one that provides benefits to class members in the form of a discount towards the future purchase of a product or service offered by the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he opinion of experienced counsel ‘should be afforded substantial consideration by a court in evaluating the reasonableness of a proposed settlement.' ”) (citation omitted). See also Crowhorn, 836 A.2d at 563 (noting that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“presumption that the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable.”). . Id. (noting that it is appropriate for the Court to consider that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.