Martin v. Leonhart’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 983 · 19 U.S.C. § 1607 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1609 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp. · Browning v. Clinton · Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]itle shall be deemed to vest in the United States free and clear of any liens or encumbrances.” 19 U.S.C. § 1609 . Thus, where a claimant fails to file a timely claim with the DEA contesting the forfeiture, the DEA may forfeit the asset, which”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.