Van Valkenburg v. J.S.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pryatel v. J.S. · In Interest of JS · In Interest of JS · Castillo v. D.Z. · In Interest of JS
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Dr. Broadhead also testified that a relapse of his mental condition would endanger others. According to Dr. Broadhead, less restrictive treatment would require J.S. to take some responsibility for his mental illness and diabetes, but J.S. would not cooperate with anything less restrictive. [¶ 9] J.S. testified on his own behalf. He testified he does not believe he has an illness. He testified he would not take medication if he were not forced to take it. He testified he wants the court to”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Js“If he was not treated there would be a great likelihood of a relapse back into the florid delusional thinking which precipitates violent outbursts, threats to himself and to others, [and] threats to himself for not caring for the diabetes which he doesn't believe he has.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Js“likely result is that he would fairly quickly go into diabetic coma . . . and it can be a life threatening situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Js
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.