¶1specially concurring:
¶2I concur only in the result in this case, based on my specially concurring opinion in Hanson v. State, 716 P.2d 688 (Okl.Cr.1985) (Parks, P.J., Specially Concurring).
717 P.2d 1153
DeVaughn v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 14, 1986
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1986-04-14
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1993
2 state decisions
Relies on Hanson v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1986-04-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →