Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 P2D 976 - People v. Salter

People v. Salter’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · People v. Moody · United States v. Spain · People v. Shackelford · Ortiz v. District Court in & for the County of Las Animas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since irreconcilable conflicts in the evidence could not have been the result of honest mistake, each counsel was of course entitled to argue that witnesses called by him had spoken the truth and those called by the other side had testified falsely. There was no other way to argue the case effectively.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.