Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 S.E.2d 789 - Bevel v. Com.

Bevel v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
5
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dove v. United States · Durham v. United States · United States v. Moehlenkamp · Sheets v. Castle · United States v. Dudley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the adoption of such a policy and the designation of how and in what court such a determination should be made is more appropriately decided by the legislature, not the courts”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “is unclear, with little or no evidence * of its application prior to the late nineteenth century.... These early decisions were occasionally quite terse and provide little insight into the reasons the courts elected to abate a case or not, or even as to what aspect of the case was being abated -- the appeal only or the entire prosecution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The public policy of the Commonwealth is determined by the General Assembly [because] it is the responsibility of the legislature, and not the judiciary,... to strike the appropriate balance between competing interests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.