Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

717 So. 2d 119

Lorenzana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1998

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-09-09

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1999

3 state decisions

Relies on 715 So. 2d 960 - Hyden v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant claims error in resentencing when the court imposed restitution as part of his sentence for the first time on remand. However, appellant neither objected at sentencing nor filed a motion to correct the sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Thus, the issue is not preserved for appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

¶2Affirmed.

STONE, C.J., and WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/717/so2d/119 · .json · Public domain