Springstead v. Springstead’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 601 So. 2d 534 - Pimm v. Pimm · 520 So. 2d 87 - Waldman v. Waldman · Phillippi v. Phillippi · Stach v. Bartsch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general rule, how the recipient spouse chooses to spend the alimony is irrelevant [e.s.] in a modification action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.