Beasley v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 629 So. 2d 883 - S&E Contractors, Inc. v. City of Tampa · Rausch v. Rausch · 659 So. 2d 1051 - Cox v. Cox · 682 So. 2d 682 - Brock v. Brock · Register v. Register
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rehabilitative alimony is for a time certain or until a specific goal has been met. Further, courts have held that a viable rehabilitative plan must be presented at the time the request for rehabilitative alimony is made. Since rehabilitative alimony is a projection based upon assumptions and probabilities, the plan must be in writing in the event the plan or goal is not achieved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.