Culbreath v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 658 So. 2d 442 - Odom v. Hull · Gresham v. Ware · 153 W. Va. 613 - Somerville v. Jacobs · Hewett v. McGaster · Manning v. Wingo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Alabama has limited its equitable rule of recovery to the following situations: (1) where an improver, acting in good faith and under the mistaken belief that he owns the land, makes improvements on the land of another, being induced to do so by `fraud, duress, undue influence, or mistake of such character that he is entitled to restitution,' Hewett v. McGaster , 272 Ala. 498 , 133 So.2d 189 (1961) (citing earlier cases); (2) where the true owner of land makes a demand for the rents and profits, a bona fide occupant under a claim of title who has made valuable improvements on the land is entitled to compensation by way of set-off against the rents or profits accruing during his occupancy, Gresham v. Ware , 79 Ala. 192 (1885); and (3) where a true owner brings an action to recover possession of land, the defendant may recover for permanent improvements by way of set-off against the value of the use and occupation of the land, upon the defendant's suggestion and proof of adverse possession for three years preceding the complaint, Ala. Code 1975, § 6-6-286 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a court may, based on the circumstances of a case, balance the equities involved under the facts and impose an equitable lien even though the party does not come within any of those three situations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.