Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

717 So. 2d 459

717 So.2d 459

23 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 192

State v. M.J.P.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 2, 1998

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1998-04-02

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1999

9 state decisions

Relies on 716 So. 2d 269 - State v. T.M.B.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-04-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SHAW, Justice.

¶1We have for review M.J.P. v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2090, — So.2d- (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.3,1997), wherein the district court certified the same question before this court in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla.1998):

DOES SECTION 924.051(4), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1996), APPLY IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS?

¶2We have jurisdiction. Art. V., § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have already answered this question in the negative in T.M.B. We approve M.J.P.

¶3It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

¶4ORDER

¶5The Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification is hereby denied.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

¶6WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.

WELLS, Justice,

¶7dissenting.

¶8I dissent for the reasons stated in my opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1998) (order denying rehearing).

¶9PARIENTE, J., concurs.

/717/so2d/459 · .json · Public domain