Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 SO2D 515 - Mays v. State

Mays v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000), 991 So. 2d 803 - Kasischke v. State (2008)

64 state decisions

420199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · 576 So. 2d 1310 - Perkins v. State · 697 So. 2d 1211 - Crump v. State · Johnson v. State · 692 So. 2d 199 - Martinez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a recommended sentence under the guidelines exceeds the maximum sentence otherwise authorized by s. 775.082, the sentence under the guidelines must be imposed, absent a departure.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If a recommended sentence under the guidelines exceeds the maximum sentence otherwise authorized by s. 775.082, the sentence recommended under the guidelines must be imposed absent a departure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “The recommended sentence length in state prison months may be increased by up to, and including, 25 percent or decreased by up to, and including, 25 percent, at the discretion of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.