717 So. 2d 6 - Bui v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Boyd v. State (2003), 746 So. 2d 364 - Boyd v. State (1999)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Batson v. Kentucky · Caldwell v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“` Strickland , 466 U.S. at 697 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069 , quoted in Thompson v. State , 615 So.2d 129 , 132 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 976 , 114 S.Ct. 467 , 126 L.Ed.2d 418 (1993).”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] finding of no plain error is one factor to consider when assessing the performance of counsel.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · Boyd v. State“"[W]e reject the notion that Alabama's statutory scheme for compensating attorneys in capital cases, in and of itself, denies a defendant effective representation. Although the burden of pleading and proof is on the appellant, Rules 32.3 and 32.6(b), Ala.R.Crim.P., he alleged no facts in his petition and presented no evidence at the hearing to support his claim that the compensation scheme in § 15-12-21(d) caused is counsel's performance to fall `outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.' Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690 , 104 S.Ct. at 2066 . Because the appellant has now shown `by a preponderance of the evidence the facts necessary to entitle [him] to relief,' Rule 32.3, we find no merit in his claim."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. State · Hyde v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.