Rasik v. State

Charles RASIK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 23, 1998.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-09-23

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2005

4 state decisions

Relies on 677 So. 2d 40 - Whitehead v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Charles Rasik, Miami, pro se.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing as to whether appellant is entitled to credit against his prison sentence for time spent in the Village South Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Center. See Whitehead v. State,677 So.2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

¶5KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.