Gunaca v. Prime, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Duke v. Young · 646 So. 2d 664 - Sudduth v. Howard · 470 So. 2d 1222 - Shrout v. Thorsen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Duke v. Young , 496 So.2d 37 , 39 (Ala. 1986). Alabama courts use a twofold analysis to determine whether personal jurisdiction exists over a nonresident defendant:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.