Morrow v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 513 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fundora · 523 So. 2d 562 - Correll v. State · 648 So. 2d 100 - Hardwick v. Dugger · 637 So. 2d 911 - Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Jenkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Similar fact evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible when relevant to prove a material fact in issue, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, but it is inadmissible when the evidence is relevant solely to prove bad character or propensity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Griffith v. State“Even when a prior motion in limine has been denied, the failure to object at the time collateral crime evidence is introduced waives the issue for appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.