Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 SW2D 225 - Hurley v. Downing

Hurley v. Downing’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. Reeves · Fann v. McGuffey · Everman v. Miller · Goodin v. Overnight Transportation Co. · Atchison v. Overcast

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is reasonable to assume that the legislature intended exactly what it said when it made the two year statute for ‘an action for tort liability’ prescribed in KRS 304.39-230(6) part of the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act, that two years applies to all tort actions not abolished by the Act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.