Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2011
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 144th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Michigan v. Doran · Ex Parte Kronhaus · 164 Tex. Crim. 251 - Ex Parte Hoover · Panelli v. State · 162 Tex. Crim. 639 - Ex Parte Cuttrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“□ a copy of an indictment found or by information supported by affidavit in the State having jurisdiction of the crime; or □ a copy of an affidavit before a magistrate from the State having jurisdiction of the crime, together with a copy of any warrant which issued thereupon; or □ a copy of a judgment of conviction or a sentence imposed in execution thereof, together with a statement by the Executive Authority of the demanding State that the person claimed has escaped from confinement or has broken the terms of his bail, probation, or parole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Babb v. State · Henson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.