Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 SW2D 520 - Poling v. Moitra

Poling v. Moitra’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2008

4 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

90198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Deere and Company v. Pinnell · Seeley v. Expert, Inc. · Miller v. Duhart · Garth v. Robards · Laughlin v. Laughlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f after such cause of action shall have accrued, such person depart from and reside out of this state, the time of his absence shall not be deemed or taken as any part of the time limited for the commencement of such action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “admits of no exception ... the Court should not engraft one by judicial legislation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.